was successfully added to your cart.

Green Bay Packers Offensive Line Weight Comparison: 1967 vs. 2010

All I gotta say, they’re growing them bigger on the farm nowadays.

Green Bay Packers. Offensive Lines Weight Comparison: 1967 vs. 2010

The seed: how large are the big men in the NFL compared to say their 60’s brethren? Of course there’s no doubt that football players are stronger, faster and bigger nowadays. But how do you make this comparison standout?

I took the Green Bay Packers 2010 Super Bowl Champs and compared them to the 1967 Green Bay Packers – the first Super Bowl Champs. Forty-three year time-frame. I compared offensive lines from each Packer team, since the behemoths of the game nowadays (and back in 1967) can usually be found at those positions.

2010 Packers Vs. 1967 Packers

Findings: the combined weight of the 1967 Green Bay Packers offensive line comes in at 1,228 pounds. That’s a lot of beef. Except that the combined weight of the 2010 offensive line comes in at a hefty 1,565 pounds. Think about it – that’s a whopping difference of 337 pounds.

Green Bay Packers Offensive Line Weight Comparison: 1967 vs. 2010. Even with Fuzzy Thurston and Olga Korbut added to the mix – the 2010 Packers' line outweighs the '67 Packers line by four pounds. The Olga Korbut Packer's Jersey would naturally be in throwback colors.

So, even if the 1967 Packers invited reserve guard Fuzzy Thurston (at 247 lbs.) to a mass weigh-in for some load balancing here – the 2010 Packers’ line would still outweigh the ’67 model by an Olga Korbut…or 90 pounds.1

Clifton Vs. Glllingham

The heaviest 2010 Packers’ offensive lineman (Chad Clifton) weighs 330 pounds. The heaviest player (Gale Gillingham) from the ’67 Packer’s line weighed 255 pounds. That’s a 75 pound difference between the heaviest players from both eras. Gale Gillingham would need to gain close to 30% of his body weight to match-up with Chad Clifton’s total weight. (For weight-gain, I highly recommend a steady diet of these bad-boys).

I’m guessing, but I would say that in today’s NFL, there’s not a sub 280 pound starting offensive lineman (center, guard and tackle) in the entire league.

Packing some major mid-drift

I haven’t checked both teams heights, but I’m interested in seeing if the ’10 Packers tower over the the ’67 lineman. Taller, but not by much is what I’m guessing.
Update: 2010 Packers average 6’4″. The 1967 Packers linemen average around 6’3″. Just as I thought – the 2010 Packers were packing some major mid-drift.

Also, I hope I can get Olga Korbut a supporting role here. Update: Olga nailed her audition.

1 Just checked, Olga Korbut’s fighting weight is 86 lbs. I knew my years as a carnie would pay-off sooner or later.

+ Source: Pro Football Reference.com